Banter about a bunny slope.
Home
Any thoughts on these skis?
15 posts from 7 users
Updated 15 days ago
572 views
Jump to Newest Post
one month ago

I’ve only used rentals and am looking to buy my first pair of skis .  I’m 6’2”, 190, can ski blacks in good conditions but am mostly on blues.  I’m mainly on groomers and don’t care about glades, moguls or terrain parks.  Sure, I’ll go into off-piste powder when available but it’s just not available much around where I ski.  If I go out West I’m content to rent wider powder skis.   My style has been more cautious but I’m looking to ski more aggressively and develop better technique.  I’d like to think I can carve OK on blues but my form breaks down on blacks and certainly on ice.  I have my own boots.  I should mention that I have done most of my skiing at Beech, Sugar, Winterplace and Wintergreen but bought the Ridiculus Pass and am looking to instead go to Snowshoe more next season.  This year we also did Gore in NY and go up to eastern Ontario every other year to see relatives for Christmas so maybe it will be an Ikon Pass and Tremblant in the season after next.  These skis look like a really good deal and well-suited to my skill level and the conditions we often face in this part of the Ice Coast.  Any thoughts on them?

https://www.levelninesports.com/fischer-xtr-pro-mt-80-skis-w-mbs-10-ski-bindings-2019-1

 

Thanks,

km

one month ago

They’d be good right now, but you’re going to be at the upper limit if the binding DIN when you progress past advanced to expert abilities.  I’d ski them but I’m 15 pounds lighter than you.  That said, if you’re over 50 the DIN drops and they’d be good for you at any ability level.  The ski itsef looks great for our terrain options.

one month ago

I’m 51.

marzNC - DCSki Supporter
one month ago

Can’t help on the skis, but did notice that getting DSP Phantom applied only costs $50 extra, on top of $100 for the Phantom.  Note that you could do the treatment at home once it warms up a bit more.

I like Phantom.  I treated my carvers that I use in the mid-Atlantic and northeast in Jan 2018.  Haven’t had to wax since then.  Have at least 25 days on those skis in assorted snow conditions, including a few days on very soft and sticky snow last May out west.  Did a direct comparison at Bachelor and Mammoth between the Phantom-treated skis and another pair that were all-mountain waxed with warm weather wax.  Ended up using the carvers more because of the glide on sticky snow even though the all-mountain skis were a more appropriate width/design for pushed around soft snow off-piste.  Phantom-treated skis slow down on sticky snow but don’t lurch to a halt in a way that makes me very nervous.  Have since treated those all-mountain skis as well.

I know how to wax skis and have the basic items needed to do it at home.  But I’m also happier not having to deal with waxing every 2-3 ski days on man-made snow.  Especially since most of my ski days are not day trips.

one month ago

Keith_Moon wrote:

I’m 51.

Sweet!  Those would be great based on what I see.  Maybe someone else can chime in who’s tried them, but they check off all the boxes I’d have for crusing groomers around here with occasionally finding some knee deep stuff.

one month ago

New skis and bindings for $340 …. good deal!

one month ago

Agreed-Even if you don’t like them or feel like you advance beyond their capabilities you should be able to get .50 on the dollar for them. Bought my daughter’s first pair of new adult expert skis & bindings years ago for $199 shipped.  It was a close out deal for skis she still has and uses. My 4 pair quiver averages $550 with 3 new & 1 used pair so $340 is a very fair deal.

one month ago

marzNC wrote:

Can’t help on the skis, but did notice that getting DSP Phantom applied only costs $50 extra, on top of $100 for the Phantom.  Note that you could do the treatment at home once it warms up a bit more.

I like Phantom.  I treated my carvers that I use in the mid-Atlantic and northeast in Jan 2018.  Haven’t had to wax since then.  Have at least 25 days on those skis in assorted snow conditions, including a few days on very soft and sticky snow last May out west.  Did a direct comparison at Bachelor and Mammoth between the Phantom-treated skis and another pair that were all-mountain waxed with warm weather wax.  Ended up using the carvers more because of the glide on sticky snow even though the all-mountain skis were a more appropriate width/design for pushed around soft snow off-piste.  Phantom-treated skis slow down on sticky snow but don’t lurch to a halt in a way that makes me very nervous.  Have since treated those all-mountain skis as well.

I know how to wax skis and have the basic items needed to do it at home.  But I’m also happier not having to deal with waxing every 2-3 ski days on man-made snow.  Especially since most of my ski days are not day trips.

That sounds cool - I’m tempted to get the Phantom application if I buy these based on your rec.

marzNC - DCSki Supporter
one month ago

Keith_Moon wrote:

That sounds cool - I’m tempted to get the Phantom application if I buy these based on your rec.

I wrote more about Phantom in this thread:

How much is not having to wax worth? New idea from DPS

one month ago

Fischer is still family owned and still makes skis in Austria (and also Ukraine).  Fun article in New York Times last year in 2018 (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/28/sports/skiing/from-tree-to-ski-at-the-fischer-family-factory.html).  They are known for top notch craftsmanship.  They actually make a lot of skis for other brands.  I think their own in-house stuff is fantastic.  I’m on a pair of Ranger’s this season and love them.  For whatever reason their North America marketing isn’t very robust.  Their sponsorship is still mostly race oriented, which means European athletes American’s have never heard of.  Their website is clunky and adapted from the Austrian site (and still has Austrian text).  My theory is that as a result is they don’t have a lot of brand “cachet” and you can find great deals on their skis in North America.

one month ago

marzNC wrote:

Keith_Moon wrote:

That sounds cool - I’m tempted to get the Phantom application if I buy these based on your rec.

I wrote more about Phantom in this thread:

How much is not having to wax worth? New idea from DPS

There’s a super long thread on Pugski about it here:

https://www.pugski.com/threads/review-dps-phantom-permanent-base-glide-treatment.7690/

marzNC - DCSki Supporter
one month ago

Keith_Moon wrote:

marzNC wrote:

Keith_Moon wrote:

That sounds cool - I’m tempted to get the Phantom application if I buy these based on your rec.

I wrote more about Phantom in this thread:

How much is not having to wax worth? New idea from DPS

There’s a super long thread on Pugski about it here:

https://www.pugski.com/threads/review-dps-phantom-permanent-base-glide-treatment.7690/

Did you see that someone on Pugski is selling three unopened packs of Phantom for $75.  Note that it makes a difference if they are Version 1 or Version 2.  The cure time for Version 1 is 3 hours of strong sunlight, while that was shortened to only 1 hour per liquid (A, B) for Version 2.  Apparently Version 2 is also a bit faster in terms of glide.  Although for my style of skiing in the mid-Atlantic, Ver 1 on my AJs is plenty fast enough for the short slopes since I prefer to make more turns rather than straightline to another lift ride.

one month ago

marzNC wrote:

Keith_Moon wrote:

marzNC wrote:

Keith_Moon wrote:

That sounds cool - I’m tempted to get the Phantom application if I buy these based on your rec.

I wrote more about Phantom in this thread:

How much is not having to wax worth? New idea from DPS

There’s a super long thread on Pugski about it here:

https://www.pugski.com/threads/review-dps-phantom-permanent-base-glide-treatment.7690/

Did you see that someone on Pugski is selling three unopened packs of Phantom for $75.  Note that it makes a difference if they are Version 1 or Version 2.  The cure time for Version 1 is 3 hours of strong sunlight, while that was shortened to only 1 hour per liquid (A, B) for Version 2.  Apparently Version 2 is also a bit faster in terms of glide.  Although for my style of skiing in the mid-Atlantic, Ver 1 on my AJs is plenty fast enough for the short slopes since I prefer to make more turns rather than straightline to another lift ride.

Strangely, I just went on the L9 web site and selected those Fischer skis with the Phantom treatment and it said they were out of stock, which is really odd to me because it’s not the skis which were out of stock - it’s the Phantom treatment.  Which means what exactly?  They don’t have a staff member who can do the application any more?  Because they can always get more of the actual fluid or wax or whatever you want to call it, unless DPS has stopped selling it, which is unlikely.  Very strange.

marzNC - DCSki Supporter
one month ago

Keith_Moon wrote:

Strangely, I just went on the L9 web site and selected those Fischer skis with the Phantom treatment and it said they were out of stock, which is really odd to me because it’s not the skis which were out of stock - it’s the Phantom treatment.  Which means what exactly?  They don’t have a staff member who can do the application any more?  Because they can always get more of the actual fluid or wax or whatever you want to call it, unless DPS has stopped selling it, which is unlikely.  Very strange.

Last season DPS did run out of Phantom 1.0 before summer.  They stopped making the old formulation since they were going to come out with an improved version.  I suppose it’s possible there will be Phantom 3.0 for the 2019-20 season.

Out of curiosity I checked another pair of skis … DPS Wailer.  Also cannot be bought with Phantom 2.0 added by L9.  Note that the Phantom option is not included on all skis.  Doesn’t seem to show up on skis that are geared more for beginners/intermediates that cost less than $300.

I don’t know the arrangement for the Cure Stations.  If those are done on a lease arrangement, possible that a shop could decide not to keep it after a certain date.  Although I would think L9 has another few weeks for their late season sales.

15 days ago

crgildart wrote:

1) They’d be good right now, but you’re 2) going to be at the upper limit if the binding DIN when you progress past advanced to expert abilities.  I’d ski them but I’m 15 pounds lighter than you.  That said, if you’re 3) over 50 the DIN drops and they’d be good for you at any ability level.  4) The ski itsef looks great for our terrain options.

1) Yes looks like a good right now ski choice, a progressive frontside ski

2) Common generalization to say so - see below
3) Yes binding settings drop at 50 for all skier types
4) Reviews do look strong and contsruction a good fit for east coast type groomers

Height and weight are a factor, but it is the base sole length or length of the boot & foot - BSL that is by far the largest factor in determining DIN setting limits between different skiers. Two skiers of the same height and weight could have radically different DINs if they have different foot sizes. Or two skiers of different weights could have the same DIN. I have a friend 50 lbs lighter than I, same settings because his foot is proportionally smaller.

@keith_moon Enter you details here for an estimate if you don’t already have an idea of your usual DIN values. A good tip is anytime you rent skis, to be sure to ask what they are setting you at, so you have an idea. Realizes these are just estimates, each binding maker has a slightly different chart: http://www.dincalculator.com/#/ If you don’t know your BSL, look on your boot, or use this chart to estimate https://www.evo.com/guides/ski-boot-sole-length-size-chart 

Important side note - Bindings, especially system (factory attached) are normally matched partially to the type of ski - as in a ski with a higher DIN value is targetted towards more agressive skiers. Not a rule but a consideration. So a ski with a max DIN of 10 would be one of their cheapest bindings, so geared toward a blue cruising skier. Not to say its not a good choice, especially if you’re over 50 and just dropped a level down the charts, just take a look at the whole package. Price is relative here. A ski with a full retail price of under $450 is a entry level ski. It will certainly be a better ski than a standard rental ski (non-performance/+$$) anywhere here on the east.

If you haven’t already been told - a quality pair of boots is FAR FAR more important than the ski. If you don’t have boots, get them first.

A ski swap ski + a good fitting boot >>> Awesome perfectly matched ski + a mediocre fit boot

Ad: Canaan Valley Resort

Sharpen your edges. And pencils.
If you'd like to share your own comments, please log in to DCSki.
Don't have a profile? Create one here.
Page load time: 0.21 seconds