Wisp's New Look
7 posts
5 users
1k+ views
David
December 30, 2007
Member since 06/28/2004 🔗
2,444 posts
Just checked out Wisp's new website. I must say that I am impressed with the upgrade. Very professional and much easier to navigate. GOOD JOB WISP!!!

Check it out if you haven't seen it yet:
http://www.skiwisp.com/wisp/index.aspx
bawalker
December 30, 2007
Member since 12/1/2003 🔗
1,547 posts
I saw that yesterday and was plesantly surprised by it. I still remember the old one they had up before the last one. Man i feel old now.
bawalker
December 30, 2007
Member since 12/1/2003 🔗
1,547 posts
They also don't have the northcamp webcams linked up yet on there, I did notice that.
langleyskier
December 30, 2007
Member since 12/7/2004 🔗
824 posts
ya it looks nice but is kinda hard to find all the skiing info (conditions/cams)
David
December 31, 2007
Member since 06/28/2004 🔗
2,444 posts
 Originally Posted By: langleyskiier
ya it looks nice but is kinda hard to find all the skiing info (conditions/cams)


Yeah. I found that everything looked a whole lot better, the layout still leaves some to be desired...
bousquet19 - DCSki Supporter 
January 1, 2008
Member since 02/23/2006 🔗
778 posts
While my overall impression of Wisp's new website is good, they have some fixing to do. Get a link to *Snow Report* on the home pages, and make the webcams easy to find. Also, the new site no longer indicates which runs have been groomed. Why not?
tommo
January 1, 2008
Member since 01/16/2004 🔗
303 posts
 Originally Posted By: bousquet19
the new site no longer indicates which runs have been groomed. Why not?


Mouse over "Ski and Board" at the top and the full snow report is the top menu item. It lists the status of every trail and lift.

I agree that the web cams are no longer as accessible as before and they should show more camera shots. Personally, I'd like to see a link to the full range of all 50 or so camera shots....

Ski and Tell

Snowcat got your tongue?

Join the conversation by logging in.

Don't have an account? Create one here.

0.15 seconds